Four Proposed Judges Face Scrutiny Over Appointment Process and Impartiality

Kathmandu. Senior advocate Rajesh Kafle has raised questions about the appointment process and impartiality of the four proposed judges recommended for the Supreme Court, in the Parliamentary Hearing Committee.< /p>

Complainant Kafle has claimed that the recommendation process carried out by the Judicial Council is itself controversial, at a time when the credibility and impartiality of the judiciary are continuously being questioned by the public. He asserts that the fact that the decision could not be made by a single vote or consensus from the Judicial Council has created suspicion about the recommendation.< /p>